Policy Lunchbox: Access and Benefit sharing through the Nagoya Protocol

 

Katie Beckett from Regulatory Delivery joined us at Policy Lunchbox to shed some light on Access and Benefit Sharing of genetic resources.

Since 22 May 2016, the UK has been Party to the heftily-titled

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity

… or Nagoya Protocol, for short.

Despite the cumbersome name, the premise is simple and reasonable: if someone from one country uses a genetic resource from another (e.g. from plants, animals or microbes), then consent should be given and there should be an opportunity to share the benefits.

The responsibilities fall on many of us, whether we work in academic research labs or institutes, ex situ biological collections or in industry. In the UK, Regulatory Delivery (RD), a directorate within the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, is the authority responsible for ensuring that UK legislation on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) is adhered to. Katie Beckett, the ABS Enforcement Team Leader at RD, joined us to give some background on the Nagoya Protocol and outlined the responsibilities of those involved in research & development.

 

Friends with benefits

The Nagoya Protocol came about from a desire to have an internationally-recognised legal framework for collaboration between the providers and users of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge. Ultimately, resources should be shared in a transparent way that ensures sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity.

Integral to this noble pursuit is the requirement for Prior Informed Consent (PIC), which is given by the country providing the resource, and Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT), an agreement between user and provider on the benefits to be shared. ‘Shared benefits’ can cover many things, from technology transfer and training to royalty payments. Once agreed, the provider country may then generate an Internationally Recognised Certificate of Compliance (IRCC) to be enshrined within the ABS Clearing House, an international database that contains information from all the countries who are Party to the Nagoya Protocol (96 and rising).

Importantly, under current UK law, those using a genetic resource should inform Regulatory Delivery that a PIC and MAT are in place upon receipt of research funding and when a product is placed on the market.

 .

Navigating the Nagoya Protocol

Whilst this might seem impenetrable at a first glance, thankfully there are many who are working to straighten out the landscape. The European Commission has already published general guidelines on following European ABS regulation and further sector specific guidance is in the pipeline, which will focus on areas including plant & animal breeding, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

In addition, organisations are coming out with their own best practice guidelines, such as those developed by the Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure (MIRRI). A number of these are accessible through the ABS Clearing House database.

As a starter for 10, Katie outlined some instances in which EU regulations will apply to researchers (found within the general guidelines):

Yes

No

Research on a genetic resource leading to the isolation of a biochemical compound Maintenance and management of a collection for conservation purposes
Breeding programme to create a new plant variety based on naturally occurring plants Describing the phenotype of a genetic resource
Genetic modification – creation of a genetically modified animal containing a gene from another species Supply and processing of relevant raw materials for incorporation into a product (no new research)

Where to next?

The discussion after Katie’s talk highlighted that many aspects of ABS regulation and implementation are at an early stage. Indeed certain aspects, such as the applicability to digital genetic sequence data, are still being discussed at the international level. So, how can you keep updated and get involved?

  1. The UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) convene an ABS Stakeholder Group, which a number of Learned Societies and other organisations are subscribed to. This is a key way to receive up-to-date information and communicate your views to the UK Government and European Commission.
  2. The Royal Society of Biology is currently consulting the Biosciences sector on specific issues relating to the Nagoya Protocol. If you are a member of the RSB, or a related member organisation, keep an eye out for further details soon.
  3. A UK University Forum is currently being established to support the Higher Education sector. Get in touch with Katie (Katie.Beckett@beis.gov.uk) for further details.

Further reading

  1. The Linnean Society have prepared an excellent summary briefing of the Nagoya Protocol, which covers a lot of background and links to helpful tools and best practice guidance.
  2. Smith et al. have published a freely-accessible article on the implications of the Nagoya Protocol for microbiology.

Policy Lunchbox is a joint initiative between the Biochemical Society, the British Ecological Society, the Microbiology Society, the Royal Society of Biology, the Society for Applied Microbiology, and the Society of Experimental Biology. You can sign up to the mailing list and receive invitations to events straight to your inbox.



Categories: Feature Articles, Policy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: